Prediction of Magnus Tideman vs John Ross Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Tideman vs J. Ross

Magnus Tideman

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

John Ross

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Tideman 1 - 0 Ross

They have played 5 sets in total, with Magnus Tideman winning 3 and John Ross winning 2. The last match between Magnus Tideman and John Ross was at the Australian Open, 11-01-1988, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Magnus Tideman getting the victory 6-4 6-7 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tideman	1
Ross	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Australian Open(01-11-88)

Stats

Magnus Tideman

John Ross

M. Tideman vs J. Ross H2H Profile

M. Tideman	Stats	J. Ross
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
42.02% (50-69)	Career Total W/L	32.47% (25-52)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Tideman vs J. Ross Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Magnus Tideman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while John Ross has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Magnus Tideman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while John Ross has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Magnus Tideman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas John Ross has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Magnus Tideman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with John Ross winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Magnus Tideman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 39/49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). John Ross has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 18/31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 6/15).
Player level: In the last year, Magnus Tideman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as John Ross has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Magnus Tideman winning 1 times and John Ross being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Magnus Tideman winning 3 and John Ross winning 2.
The last match between Magnus Tideman and John Ross was at the Australian Open, 11-01-1988, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Magnus Tideman getting the victory 6-4 6-7 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Magnus Tideman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while John Ross has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Magnus Tideman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while John Ross has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Magnus Tideman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and John Ross has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Magnus Tideman vs John Ross Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Tideman vs J. Ross H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Tideman	Stats	J. Ross
1	H2H Matches Won	0
3	Sets Won	2
28	Games Won	22
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Tideman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Stuttgart Outdoor - 24-07-1989
R2 Marian VajdaM. Vajda	L	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Croydon CH - 13-02-1989
R3 Peter BastiansenP. Bastiansen	W	7-6 6-4	Stats
R4 Scott WarnerS. Warner	L	6-7 6-3 7-6	Stats
Pescara CH - 22-08-1988
R3 Alejandro AramburuA. Aramburu	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Stuttgart Outdoor - 11-07-1988
R2 Mansour BahramiM. Bahrami	L	6-4 3-6 7-6	Stats

View All

J. Ross Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Washington - 15-07-1991
R1 Chuck AdamsC. Adams	L	5-7 6-3 7-6(2)	Stats
Cincinnati - 06-08-1990
R1 Milan SrejberM. Srejber	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
Washington - 16-07-1990
R1 Nicolas PereiraN. Pereira	L	7-6 6-2	Stats
Kiawah Island - 07-05-1990
R1 Joey RiveJ. Rive	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Orlando - 02-04-1990
R1 Jimmy AriasJ. Arias	W	7-6 1-6 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Tideman vs J. Ross Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Tideman	Stats	J. Ross
42.02% (50/69)	YTD Win/Loss	32.47% (25/52)
43.15% (126/166)	Sets Win/Loss	36.41% (71/124)
46.87% (1281/1452)	Games Win/Loss	45.57% (889/1062)
43.48% (10/13)	Hard Win/Loss	36.73% (18/31)
44.32% (39/49)	Clay Win/Loss	28.57% (6/15)
14.29% (1/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/4)
0.00% (0/1)	Grass Win/Loss	33.33% (1/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
498.4	Average Opponent Rank	233.7
50.00% (3/3)	Slam W/L	28.57% (2/5)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/5)
26.19% (11/31)	Main Tour W/L	37.10% (23/39)
51.43% (36/34)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/3)
41% (46/111)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	34% (23/68)
50% (3/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	22% (2/9)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
50% (23/46)	Deciding Set Win %	41% (11/27)
75% (53/40)	1st Set Won, Won Match	70% (27/19)
25% (53/13)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	30% (27/8)
15% (66/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	12% (50/6)